Which combination of audiometric results in an adolescent would suggest nonorganic hearing loss?

Study for the ETS Praxis Audiology Test. Sharpen your skills with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each packed with hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which combination of audiometric results in an adolescent would suggest nonorganic hearing loss?

Explanation:
Nonorganic hearing loss is suspected when there is a large gap between pure-tone thresholds and how the person actually hears and understands speech. In organic loss, the speech threshold (SRT) and the pure-tone threshold (PTA) line up closely, and word recognition (WRS) follows expected patterns. But in nonorganic cases, the person may show much poorer PTA than their real ability to hear speech would suggest, while SRT and WRS indicate much better hearing. Here, the pure-tone average around 50 dB would imply a moderate hearing loss, yet the speech-reception threshold is only 20 dB and word recognition is perfect at 50 dB. This means the adolescent can understand speech at a level far better than the PTA would predict and can recognize words with full accuracy at the level used for testing, which is inconsistent with the measured tonal loss. That mismatch—poor PTA with excellent speech understanding—fits nonorganic hearing loss. The other patterns either show close alignment between PTA and SRT (and typically consistent WRS), or present results that don’t reflect the same kind of suspicious discrepancy, so they don’t point to nonorganic loss in the same way.

Nonorganic hearing loss is suspected when there is a large gap between pure-tone thresholds and how the person actually hears and understands speech. In organic loss, the speech threshold (SRT) and the pure-tone threshold (PTA) line up closely, and word recognition (WRS) follows expected patterns. But in nonorganic cases, the person may show much poorer PTA than their real ability to hear speech would suggest, while SRT and WRS indicate much better hearing.

Here, the pure-tone average around 50 dB would imply a moderate hearing loss, yet the speech-reception threshold is only 20 dB and word recognition is perfect at 50 dB. This means the adolescent can understand speech at a level far better than the PTA would predict and can recognize words with full accuracy at the level used for testing, which is inconsistent with the measured tonal loss. That mismatch—poor PTA with excellent speech understanding—fits nonorganic hearing loss.

The other patterns either show close alignment between PTA and SRT (and typically consistent WRS), or present results that don’t reflect the same kind of suspicious discrepancy, so they don’t point to nonorganic loss in the same way.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy